With so many bearish Articles
and many pundits getting bearish ...
... now I am not so sure we get the 18% to 20% pull back I was
expecting. I am still on the cautious side and believe the market
will test the recent lows, but the overall negative tone, makes me
wonder. Any thoughts?
|
|
This article from yesterday is good. As always, it's about the
Fed tomorrow.
finance.yahoo.com/ne...6.html
So next few days, who the hell knows. I see we've had more bad
news in the last 24 hours from HP (30K more layoffs) and Fedex
(lower earnings and lower guidance), and the market breadth
leadership is very narrow which IMO means new highs look unlikely.
Even if the Fed doesn't hike rates, we'll just revisit this
discussion next month and the month after, and the uncertainty will
be an overhang. I think that plus the recent price action has given
enough people the thought to be selling into rallies, which isn't
the same as going short and looking for 20% declines.
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 8:32 AM CDT
|
|
Good article indeed. I do plan to add (401K money which is
still mostly in guaranteed fund) again when the market dips again.
I moved some money from guaranteed fund into equity funds
when the market was down around 11%-12%. I think a 18%
correction would be healthy for the overall market but who knows if
we get it or not.
Re HP and FedEx: I would not pay too much attention to HP.
FedEx is of course very important, not just stateside, but
globally, so that is a warning sign. It would be interesting
to see, if the slow down is due to all regions being soft or if it
is mostly due to Asia slowdown. The state of its US operations
could also tells us a lot about the health of our economy.
Not saying Asia does not matter, it certainly could dent our
GDP. I am just wondering about the details of the FedEx
warning.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 8:50 AM CDT
|
|
I will be reading the FedEx Seeking Alpha CC transcript, I think
it is very important, thanks for posting the FedEx warning.
With Corporate profits near or at record highs there is no
room to the upside given that Europe is still slow, Asia is headed
down. The US will feel the pressure of the global slow down,
hence my expectation that the markets will drop to test recent
lows.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 8:56 AM CDT
|
|
Re Fedex, we've heard so much about "Everything is Awesome"
everywhere, things couldn't get better in the US it seems, and
China 7% growth, so how could Fedex both miss and guide lower? Does
not compute. We could talk about CAT's what it is 30 straight
months of YoY global sales declines? If "Everything is Awesome",
these things wouldn't be happening.
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 9:22 AM CDT
|
|
Agree. I do have a question re CAT: What % of sales
originate in China (and the rest of Asia by extension) and Europe?
We know Europe has been in the dumps for quite many years, in
fact I would argue that Europe has not really recovered from the
financial crisis, there are a few Pockets of strength (Germany and
Scandinavian countries, although that may no longer be), but most
of the Eurozone is not in good shape. So I would strongly
agree that a lot of the old world infrastructure, materials and
cyclical industries are not functioning well and will struggle to
grow, given the mish mash of weak economies. The dollar is
now a tall obstacle which will dampen revenues and profit
growth.
Major corporations statewide have remained lean, hesitant
to hire and to spend (CapEx) to improve productivity, so profits
are at records, but it is mostly because of the fact that they are
running so lean. That too will eventually have to change.
Not going to go on forever, eventually companies will need to
invest or eventually die as competition could dent their ability to
compete effectively in the global economy. When that happens
is anyone's guess.
Then we have the Feds around the world still pumping
liquidity everywhere. Which is the major reason stocks are
now overvalued (IMO).
Many tech companies are in sharp contrast growing extremly
well, regardless. They are hiring and have enourmous CapEx
Budgets
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 9:38 AM CDT
|
|
Share buybacks have been a huge factor in the market. I agree HP
is largely company specific, but again if "Everything is Awesome",
a big company like that shouldn't really be in such trouble. It
should be Easy Street for them. I exaggerate slightly, of course. I
find it disgusting though how many billions they have been spending
buying their own shares even as they lay off tens of thousands. The
execs gotta make sure they're well set.
zerohedge.com/ne...-30000
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 10:04 AM CDT
|
|
My take on HP is that it is now truly a commodity product
company, except for the Services division. Even the Server
market is IMO about to be in a tough fight given that ARM through
companies like AMCC and others will help in driving down the gross
margins on servers. The printer division has not been a gross
margin driver for years. Now, I do not follow HP closely, but
what innovation has come out of that company?
So, I tend to think it is mostly if not entirely company
specific. The sector has been tough given the state of
commoditization. A similar company to HP is IBM, except IBM has had
the ability to reinvent itself and has real R&D. IBM finds
itself challenged once again, but I bet they will manage to
reinvent themselves again, HP would do well in taking a page out of
IBM’s book.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 10:26 AM CDT
|
|
Jester,
I've followed CAT closely for the last several years, as I own a
small chunk of it (very bad decision, must've been in a seconal
stupor at the time). And you're exactly right - the business has
been dismal and declining for years. I also take it as one
indication of the underlying economic realities, since what they do
is essential to the basic materials of economies, which, along with
commodities, has been a terrible place to be for some time now. I
have kept wondering whether the divergence beween indicators like
CAT's sales and the ever-upward path of other sectors meant that
there was a basic underlying reality being ignored, or whether
there is some other way to explain that divergence that makes
sense. I'd have to vote for the former, but I've been pessimistic
about the market for years, and so far, have been wrong on
that.
Interesting to me also is, immediately after the article you
cited on Business Insider, was an interview with Paul Krugman, not
sure if you caught it. He's saying the market is wrong, Yellen is
right, and don't pull the trigger on raising interest rates until
you see real inflation starting to take hold. He's always been
crowing that his call on printing money with no backing is the
absolute best thing to do. I still wonder how, when, and if the
consequences of QE infinite (or indefinite) will be felt.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/16/15 at 2:02 PM CDT
|
|