<p>A significant amount of development money down the drain, I'd think, as they're going to have to start from scratch:</p> <p> <a href=" pcgamer.com/vi...-game/">pcgamer.com/vi.../a> </p> <p>But it's all good - this kind of thing never has impacted the stock price significantly in the past, IIRC, so why should it now? Their funny-munny accounting from the past, if still in place, should hide all signs of a wound. In my memory, there was a time when if they had 18 significant games in development, the failure of one or two really wouldn't be terribly significant. Don't know the state of that issue in modern times, but with the budgets that AAA titles have, and the risk big-budget new ideas carry as opposed to more-of-the-same formulas, I'd have to wonder how many top-tier titles are in development at any one time.</p> <p> </p>