Report on Fiber Optics in the
US
Report: U.S. will fall behind on 5G without massive fiber
investment
To remain a global leader in the next generation of wireless
technology, the U.S. will need to spend at least $130 billion on
fiber optics within the next several years, according to an
industry report.
The U.S. is moving toward the launch of fifth-generation
mobile networks (5G), but its fiber optics infrastructure may not
be able to keep up.
In a new report, Deloitte warns that 5G in the United States
will “fall far short of its potential unless the United
States significantly increases its deep fiber investments.”
In fact, Deloitte claims, the deployment of fiber optics is perhaps
more important than the launch of 5G itself.
With smart city innovations at the forefront of municipal
technology efforts and mobile data traffic predicted to increase
fourfold by 2021, carriers will not be able to support the
necessary bandwidth without increasing fiber density.
“We often compare it to highway structure,” said
Dan Littmann, principal of technology, media and telecommunications
at Deloitte. “Building 5G [without fiber optic
infrastructure] would [be like] building all the exit ramps without
having the highway to connect it, which is what fiber
provides.”
Deloitte estimates that $130 to $150 billion must be invested
in the next five to seven years to build sufficient fiber
infrastructure. The report suggests the cost could be shouldered by
communications service providers, financial investors and
public/private partnerships, but Littmann said nearly all of the
funding can be provided by the private sector.
“I see it mostly coming from the private sector because
there is a business case for it,” Littmann said.
"There’s credible growth and demand for consumers and
businesses, which is the reason why there can be traffic growth.
And there’s a shortage of supply of fiber and network
capacity right now, which makes for a strong investment
case.”
Fiber optics investors have faced criticism in the past, with
detractors citing concerns of not being able to recoup the mounting
costs of installation. Littmann said these concerns could be
allayed by rolling back government regulations that inhibit private
investment and cause carriers to “invest in legacy
technologies versus redirecting those capital investments toward
fiber or toward 5G."
Legislators must act fast if they want to ensure that carrier
investments fit the overall goal of closing the digital divide and
increasing network density and broadband competition, the report
says — "Without rapid and decisive action, the costs to
recover may soon become insurmountable."
While Littmann said the rollback of regulations would improve
the “business case” for deep fiber deployment, he also
stressed that carriers must develop new monetization mechanisms to
offset high upfront deployment costs.
Chattanooga, Tennessee Chief Information Officer Brent Messer
told StateScoop in June that having a gigabit fiber optic network
has been key to supporting Chattanooga’s smart city projects,
including one of the nation’s largest open-by-default data
portals.
"I've talked to a lot of other cities and one of their
biggest challenges is that they want to do some of this
interconnectivity, some of this smart traffic and small cell stuff,
but they don't have the fiber infrastructure and to put the fiber
infrastructure in is extremely expensive,” Messer said.
“It's an obvious advantage for us, and if we didn't have it,
we wouldn't be where we are now, quite
honestly.”
As smart cities develop use cases to mitigate traffic and
parking congestion, enhance public safety and improve utility and
transportation efficiency, they rely on wireless network
connectivity, Littmann said. Without the fiber infrastructure that
wireless depends on, this kind of innovation would collapse. In
February, Verizon Wireless announced 11 cities where it would
deploy 5G towers to support smart city efforts.
Despite the huge infrastructure cost, Littmann surmised that
new financial models would arise after installation by the private
sector. Rhode Island issued a request for information last year,
encouraging proposals from the private sector in hopes of
positioning the state as a national leader in the space. The extent
to which fiber infrastructure will be included in President Donald
Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure plan is unclear, though he
announced in June that support for rural broadband would be
included in some capacity.
When it comes to companies in the telecommunications
industry, Littmann said they often prioritize connectivity and
network capacity. Moving forward, Littmann said the country should
prioritize leading in 5G, just as the U.S. led in 4G when it
launched in 2010.
“Leadership in 4G allowed the U.S. to be kind of the
test bed of innovation for many new applications and devices,"
Littmann said. "And if we can deploy the fiber and have the
incentives for the carriers to deploy the fiber and the 5G wireless
infrastructure, we can maintain that lead and continue our
leadership role in innovation."
|
|
OT - NOK, INTC
I may be wrong, as perhaps the government cooperates with
build-outs in European countries to bring them up to current
broadband needs. But I sure hope nobody in the industry has pissed
off Trump. He just abandoned the plan to replace the crumbling FBI
building with a new one that was already on the schedule.
Probably a kick in the pants to Comey, as his beloved govt.
department gets wacked spitefully.
On Intel, lt cap may have been right in its stumbling, if not
falling (I think it's lost about 10 % in the draft-down.) I knew
analysts were chiming in on dropping it from 'outperform', but
today, Jeffries downgraded it from hold to sell. Right as rain, lt,
it was just the timing that was a little off. I probably will hold
on to what I've got, and see if they can right the ship - altho I
haven't read on what the analysts think the trouble is.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
07/10/17 at 5:56 PM CDT
|
|
INTC has a ton of work to do. It will lose market share in
the lucrative Cloud and PC/Laptop segments, and it has the painful
task to go into more commodity markets, where the margins are
nothing close to what it has been acustomed to.
It is now an old stodgy giant that produces tons of cash flow. I
like INTC because of its dividend, but not in the 30s. I think that
if NVDA and AMD begin to steal market share, the stock could see
the $23 to $26 area.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
07/11/17 at 6:48 AM CDT
|
|