CSLA Analyst contends Ericson
should concentrate on Profit not Growth
By which I read: Stop the price wars and concentrate on
earnings. This too seems to confirm that the Wireless sector
is seeing a price war (with Ericson as the instigator) as the 4G
deployments slow down a lot.
blogs.barrons.com/te...rowth/
|
|
lt cap,
Jeez, none of this sound too cheery. If their 'model' is right,
I'd think the shrinking capex output, coupled with competition
(maybe ERIC will play the 'dead man's float' this time around?),
seems to set things up so there's not going to be any good news to
kite things on for quite a while. But Avi Silver is not a God, and
analysts are certainly not always right. (INFN was left for dead
when it was around 6.) It may simply mean that I've sunk a lot of
money into companies (INFN, CIEN, NOK) that really will take a ton
of patience, with NOK having the biggest chance of streamlining,
clearing dead wood, etc. and showing some results of synergies,
ahead of good news for the other companies.
I wish I had Jester's hand at options - there probably are ways
to trade my way into a better position with INFN and CIEN while
waiting for them (when?) to head back into the 20's. But I'm not
Jester :-)
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
04/12/16 at 4:46 PM CDT
|
|
Unfortunately it does not sound cheery. However, I am
totally playing this from a contrarian point of view. I plan to
continue adding to the NOK position. We have to remember that
even though Wireless revenue is set to decline, NOK is undervalued
and as the company restructures and is able to get the synergies
right, the stock should march forward towards the $8 to $9 within
the next 18 months, IMO. Then when 5G starts deployments
around the 2018 timeframe in the US and Europe revenues for NOK
should swell dramatically and its stock should break above the $11
mark. I may be frustrated with the short term valuation the
market is assigning to NOK, but I remain
very positive and bullish on the "unlocked value" story here.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
04/13/16 at 8:29 AM CDT
|
|
lt cap,
In the end, I also want to acquire more NOK- perhaps even to get
some 'trading shares' - but I'd like it better at a better
price (who wouldn't?), and that seems to be the $5.70's at the
moment. The outlook certainly seems mixed to me - NOK I think will
get lifts as synergies get worked out and good news is released as
they go along. And I've said long term the secular growth seem
almost guaranteed in the sector, I can see bumps in the road -
e.g., the 5G deployment starts in 2018, but I read somewhere that
it really isn't going to be a big factor until around 2020 in terms
of adoption - although the article said that was for businesses - I
thought 5g was just the next iteration of speed of data
transmission for smartphones, not necessarily business-centric. And
I'm an amateur, but it's my guess that the telcos are going to be
just as stingy in buying the eqiupment needed for 5g, finding ways
to restrict access, get as much $ per packet of data as they can
while keeping capex as low as possible - kind of just like
now.
Much as I hate Microsoft, perhaps NOK could take a page from
their book - design viruses that make InPhi's software solution for
DCI boxes unstable and give the equivalent of the 'blue screen of
death'. Payback time.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
04/13/16 at 1:32 PM CDT
|
|
The 5G deployment will take years to fully deploy.
The US, Europe and Japan will be first, IMO. It is true
that peak deployment will not be in 2018-2019, but it will be an
inflection point in the expectations. Right now the
expectations have dropped dramatically as everyone expects Wireless
to be a drag, so it would make sense for expectations to turn
positive as deployments begin.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
04/13/16 at 4:30 PM CDT
|
|
Jamok, NOK option plays are terrible because they are so far
apart, for example stock a fraction under $6 and the available
options are in 50 cent increments. Meanwhile EA around $64 and it
soptions are also in 50 cent increments, so 10x more granularity,
giving you much more flexibility. I've had success twice now buying
in the $5.7x range and selling on the pop towards $6.
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
04/13/16 at 9:12 AM CDT
|
|
Jester,
Yes, I've learned about that frustrating no-win situations with
stocks with a low (e.g., under $10 or so) price - the numbers just
don't make sense in terms of risk/reward, and the final factors
that crushes it even further, as you know, is the .75 per contract
or whatever your broker charges for that on top of the commission.
Your trading it instead - the cycle between the $5.70's and low
$6's seems to have worked well, so far.I know that for stocks like
Apple, where share price is measured in hundreds of $, one can buy
contracts on 10 shares, rather than 100 shares-per-contract. You'd
think it would make sense to have some opposite provision for
stocks whose shares are low, as in NOK.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
04/13/16 at 1:00 PM CDT
|
|