OT - INTC, SNDK
<p>Almost too tangled to comprehend:</p>
<p>INTC announced plans to spend $5.5 bln to build a chip
plant in China, presumably to produce the new NAND flash
replacement chips it co-developed with Micron. Micron gets cut to
'underweight' by an analyst, saying this will add to the NAND
supply glut. (Hmm...thought it was clear that the new memory isn't
a competitor to existing NAND memory, but supercedes it, and so is
the successor to the slower, older technology. Perhaps I've got
this wrong but - I had thought that SanDisk's 3D vertical memory
was an implementation of new technology. But one article I read
dated its introduction to 2006 (doesn't seem likely, since I
*think* it's just being produced in large quantities now - and is
apparently not a SanDisk only product, but licensed to many
companies.)</p> <p>Meanwhile, SanDisk had fallen from a
high of ~$106 to as low as ~$50 - I was tempted, but the analysts
were saying that demand was going to be slack and increase
competition and lower prices. I wasn't surprised to see it rise to
the low 60's.....but I checked today, and it's trading up a couple
of $ to around $78. Western Digital announced plans to buy SanDisk
for an ungodly sum of money - works out to about $86/share. So why
is SanDisk trading at $78? Seems there are complicating factors
besides getting approval - something about it trading at a high of
~$106 for the year. I don't quite get that. For WD, it makes some
surface sense in terms of their needing to re-invent themselves a
bit, mostly by producing hybrid disk/flash drives, as physical
drive platters are on their way out. But where does INTC's NAND
replacement come in on this deal? If Micron is curbed on
'oversupply' of NAND, it may make the WD-SNDK deal a bit strange,
if WD is buying technology (3D NAND flash has been around
since.....last month? 2006?) that is crushing Micron.</p>
<p>Likely just my misunderstanding something in the twists
and turns. WD obviously wouldn't lay out big bucks for older
tech....but why the rather big spread between SNDK's current price
and the announced buyout price? Is it worth it to speculate here?
Probably not, given what a muddle it is, and what it might take to
reserach it and understand all the players and parts
correctly. </p>
|
|
The acquisition of SanDisk by WDC is a clear endorsement of its
3D technology, and the fact that now the demise of
electromechanical drives is pretty much a given. I am no
expert in Flash technology nor its sector.
How many Flash technologies are there? Is it one or
several? Anyone knows?
If there are several major technologies which the market has
adopted, then the fact that WDC has chosen to go withSanDisk (via
acquisition) is not necessarily a nail in either INTC/MU nor NRAM.
But if Flash technology is unified around one standard, then
this could be a signal that this new market could get
fragmented.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
10/21/15 at 3:36 PM CDT
|
|
One more thought: If WDC is interested in SanDisk at a
decent premium and with an oversupply of Flash (according to
Jamok's post), does this mean that SanDisk could be ready to
release its 3D technology in quantity?
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
10/21/15 at 4:29 PM CDT
|
|