Market after
hours
What a farce this market is. Today, nothing but bad news all
over the globe, yet it gaps up 1.5%. If the financial media is to
be believed, it's the hope of MOAR QE from Japan and the ECB, even
though it clearly hasn't worked in Japan, or anywhere really. And
ultimately of course, the hope of MOAR from the Fed. I wonder, what
if the global economic news for the last 24 hours was merely OK or
slightly bad, would the market have gapped down 1%? Who decides
when bad news is bad enough to be great news? Do the Central
Bankers have a private message board where they give each other the
nod to buy each others markets, via market moving futures? We
already know Japan was more active with their stock buys on days
when their market dared to open lower, and the Swiss CB has been
loading up on AAPL and others.
So, guess tomorrow's AM move? +1%? -1%? Place your bets and spin
the wheel. Unless you're on that private message board, in which
case you already know.
|
|
Jester,
I feel aure that there is an entity (ies) that calls the
tune. I'm not sure exactly who they are, but I feel sure they're
neither you nor I. Its been said that 70% of trades in the market
are driven by computer algorthyms that auto-trade the market. And
such programs can place God knows how many in-and-out trades in the
second between when you decide to buy or sell, and when you
actually press the mouse button.
There's a funny story about access to the 'edges' that ensure
you never really have much of a chance of winning this roulette
game: In Chicago, there was a company who had built an underground
infrastructure which provided direct access to the NYSE, and was by
far the fastest information system in existence. They approached a
(was it a brokerage or hedge fund -can't quite recall) and said
they would provide such access to that kind of trading speed to the
firm for $10 million. At first, the firm execs thought this was
exorbitant and crazy. But when they realized the trade-speed
advantage they'd have over rivals, and how much money this could
make them, they paid the $10 on one condition - that the vendor
raise the price of the access to $20 million. They wanted the
barrier to entry for rivals to be high enough to limit their
access.
You and I have no real chance of prediction and smart trades in
this system - we can only 'draft' on where the algorythms are
taking us. Remember the guy who 'stuffed' the info channel with bad
news 'key words' and the algorhythms dropped the market 1,000
points before reversing course? Seems to me a good illustration of
who's in charge here.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
10/01/15 at 1:38 PM CDT
|
|