Jester says: The Fed hike
that will never come
A couple of paragraphs from a Market Watch article, which if
read and interpreted literally would suggest Jester will be right!
LOL probably the interpretation of the artcle author on what
the Fed did today.
"Fed officials can’t say what they will do next
until they see how economic and financial events
unfold.
The unemployment rate and the inflation rate are no longer
the triggers for Fed action. Instead, it’s the Shanghai
market, the price of oil, the value of the dollar, and the
stability of dozens of economies that will tell the Fed when
it’s safe to raise rates."
Full article:
blogs.marketwatch.com/ca...nce-2/
|
|
The Fed admitted today they are clueless, and their credibility
is shrinking every month. First they added new criteria to their
policy, the unemployment rate, then they changed the goalposts on
the number they're looking for, now they've come out and said the
economic outlook is "uncertain". Bear in mind how far off these
people were with their forecasts before they became "uncertain".
They are totally winging it.
I see one of the members even suggested NIRP by next year.
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/17/15 at 4:19 PM CDT
|
|
I saw the headline relating to that comment from one of the
members. Poor retirees, they will continue to depleete their
retirement savings. Brutal.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/17/15 at 4:24 PM CDT
|
|
Jester,
Yes, I know that the Fed grabbing another 'mandate' out of the
blue that they'll consider in terms of China and worldwide
economic prospects makes those thing new items on their criteria
for raising rates. And I had a feeling that the market would head
south today. And I understand that the effects of fed policy of
continuing to fill the punch bowl raises concerns about the
strength of the dollar and the effect of that on trade, deflation,
overseas profits, etc. (Might be a good time to buy some gold, if
one thinks that the Fed policy here equates to it wanting a weaker
dollar, and as one source said, the Fed gets what it wants.)
But is that all what this selloff is all about? And does the
fact that all these issues with China slowing along with world
trade (including emerging markets relying on selling commodities
that are denominated in dollars), were already well known and clear
as day make any difference? I can see the argument for why it
doesn't (above), but it does almost seem like if the Fed
acknowledges it, it suddenly becomes 'real', as if it wasn't before
they weighed in on it. Pinnochio economics?
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/18/15 at 1:49 PM CDT
|
|
It's all subject to interpretation of course. My opinion is that
the Fed has become less transparent, which means volatility and
risk. I also think part of it is that they are losing credibility.
When you want someone to have your back, you want them to have
credibility. Note that the China market collapsed despite threats
of arrests, Govt buying of stocks, daily propaganda, etc., because
central banks can mask risk but they cannot eliminate it.
Rate hike when S&P hits 2400, QE4 when S&P hits 1700.
There's your data dependency :-)
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/18/15 at 2:02 PM CDT
|
|
I am still not confident that the actions or lack thereof
of the Fed really matter today. On the one hand, I know that
reversing years of zero rates to increasing rates is
psychologically tough for markets to digest given that the dollar
will innevitably rise further against the currencies of weak
economies. On the other hand, I also know that the Fed will
do rate increases very gradually until inflation forces their hand
which should have a gradual effect on the economy, I also am in the
camp that believes that there is currently a rate ceiling due to
the current low economic growth and persistently low inflation
(again, due to very poor growth rates around the globe), this
ceiling is likely to cap rates (Fed rate not treasuries) at
somewhere in the neighborhood of 2.5 to 3% in the mid term (3 to 5
years). Given this, I believe this is just the normal
adjustment period, but one that would pass quickly, only caveat
would be if China has a true economic crash, then all bets are
off.
That said, IMO markets are still biased on the downside,
rallies are on very poor volume and drops are not met with
buying. From where I stand, the Fed inaction is not what is
driving the market now, it is more of a macro problem and the
markets are simply just looking for further drops. Prices
just need to be more attractive before buyers come in
force.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/21/15 at 4:38 PM CDT
|
|
lt cap,
There was a pretty funny story on NPR yesterday, quoting from
the 'Banker's Almanac' - kind of like the Farmer's Almanac, but
different - weather conditions - such as cumulous clouds heading
south over Washington, D.C. means that the Fed will hike rates
soon. Other weather conditions contraindicate that. Red clouds with
a glaring sunset means we're at war, etc. Probably as accurate if
not more so on wtf the fed will do, and when, if anything but
continue to burble nonsense.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/17/15 at 4:36 PM CDT
|
|
That's funny. An alternate method is to use Astrology,
which is in fact used by some nut job traders as a method to divine
market direction, LOL
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
09/17/15 at 4:48 PM CDT
|
|