OT - LGF
<p>OT - LGF - Curious, LGF down 4% today, but earnings are
not until tomorrow. Last quarter they had a 21.9% negative earnings
surprise. But looking at analysts (yes I know, not a great
indicator, the majority are 'buy's, lesser number of 'holds' and
one that has a negative rating - Caris and Co. - not anyone
authoratative, much less someone you've heard of. Somebody must be
quite bearish on what tomorrow will bring. They are expected to do
well on at least 3 upcoming films. They had better, I guess. But
what has pushed their price up to near-record territory seems to
be, as folks here (Jester esp.) have opined, is that content is
still king, just a 'bigger king' than before. My thought is this:
If you look at the telecom sector, just one instance, there is no
growth organically - market is saturated with cellphones. So, aside
from stealing market share, the simplest way to increase earnings
is to sell more bandwith per customer - and streaming is a strong
secular trend, which is why we're interested in ALU and related
co's. ATT bought DirectTV, and VZ has annouced partnerships to
provide more content. Macquerie is the most recent analyst to weigh
in on LGF, with a $45 PT and a 'buy' rating, citing exactly the
content value factor increasing.</p> <p>I don't have a
big stake in LGF - sold 2/3 of my position in the mid-30's. But
tomrrow should be interesting.</p> <p>On a side note,
it's interesting to me that when good news hits ALU, such as what
lt cap posted today, it moves the stock not at all. My guess is
that part of that is that news from NOK is much more focused on
that ALU at the moment. Whatever it is, it's fine by me. I wish I
had bought more around $3.50, and lt cap's calling $3.30's 'a gift'
seems to hold so far. In a correction/recession, I would assume
that opportunity may arise again.</p>
<p> </p>
|
|
Re LGF, I posted a short while ago I sold my last somewhere
around $38, which had been previous highs. What is the reasoning
for analysts FY17 bullishness? Looking at Yahoo Finance, they're
looking for $1.53 and $2.58BN in FY16, then $2.00 and $2.77BN in
FY17. That seems like a good amount of revenue growth and a lot of
earnings growth, in the year *after* the final Hunger Games movies
blows out the box office. Perhaps I'm wrong in thinking HG is a big
factor in their earnings and revenue? I know there's talk of other
HG stuff, maybe a prequel, and there will be solid home video sales
and box set sales of HG for years to come, but it seems that cow's
main milking is finishing this holiday season. So where's the 26.5%
eps growth the year after it coming from? And if those estimates
come down, a) that's rarely good for a stock when analysts start
revising lower, b) it'll be well over 20x, closer to 24x P/E, which
isn't cheap. It deserves a high multiple though, in part because of
real buyout chance. I'm just hoping to get back in at low
$30's.
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
08/06/15 at 8:52 AM CDT
|
|