|
Re: Totally off Topic:
Comcast offering a Streaming Local Channel Package
lt cap,
I absolutely agree that technology follows the money. And the
scarier and more visible security threats become, it is bound to
attract big money more easily. I think this might already be
seen in things like skyrocketing valuations of newer, small
cybersecurity stocks - PANW, Fireye, etc. The obvious bet is on
demand growth going forward.
But I think also that money will follow the security: that is,
for instance, it is known that 60 countries are developing AI
autonomous battlefield weapons. (Why risk human life when a robot
can fire 400 rounds a second with pinpoint accuracy, be less
vulnerable to damage, etc.? The funny, well, not-so-funny thing is
that 'accidents' with such weapons have already occurred - I think
it was around 2005? 2009? S. Africa was developing a fast-firing AI
machine gun that accidentally killed or wounded something like 9 of
their own soldiers 'by accident' in a fraction of a second. Oops -
back to the drawing board. But I digress.) What I mean is, what
country is willing to give up development of AI weapons, some of
mass destruction, when that hands their enemies a tremendous
advantage? The US-China agreement on curbing industrial cyber
spying seems a joke to me. The possibility of 'cheating' almost
insures both sides will continue to do so. 'Security agreements'
about development of such battlefieldweapons are likely to be
worthless. We condemned Saddam for WMD's when in fact he had none -
but despite it being outlawed by treaty, we have copious stockpiles
of bacterial/nerve/chemical weapons just in case our enemies have
them. My point is that where battlefield AI will be a weapons
advantage, no one will really give up development of them for fear
that their neighbors won't. So money gets poured into 'security' in
the form (or promise) that our battlefield AI weapons will be
superior to anything anyone else produces. The same forces that
govern the stock market (fear and greed) will probably drive the AI
weapons market. Mutual Assured Destruction, a policy of the last
century that was finally deemed as an insane concept, is probably
now in vogue again, in a new guise. Lockheed, anyone?
|
|